A score needs support
A bare experience claim, low-confidence evidence or unresolved contradiction leaves a criterion unscored in the new assessment format.
← HAN / ExploreEvery useful insight
EVIDENCE & ASSESSMENT
Every useful insight
has a source.
Move between the report and the conversation behind it. See supported observations, unexplored areas and the follow-up questions that could clarify them.
READ THE EVIDENCE
Practical reasoningSource ↗
“I checked the supply first, then tested the connection.”
An explained sequence of actions. Follow up on why they chose it.
—
Illustrative evidence reading; not an actual candidate report.Team coordinationNot explored in this example
01 / READ WITH CONTEXT
A claim and an explanation
tell you different things.
Compare the examples below. Notice what the candidate actually says, what it supports and which question could deepen the understanding.
THE CANDIDATE’S WORDS
“I have worked in maintenance for three years.”Illustrative conversation example
WHAT CAN WE UNDERSTAND?
The candidate reports maintenance experience. This sentence alone does not show how they diagnose a fault.
Self-reported · More context needed
A USEFUL NEXT QUESTIONWould you like to describe a fault you solved recently?
02 / FROM RESULT TO SOURCE
Read the words
behind the observation.
New assessments attach candidate quotations to summary claims, strengths and criterion observations. Source links help you revisit the surrounding conversation.
A matching quotation establishes where the words came from. Whether an interpretation is sound still requires review.
Coverage is visible
An overall score requires at least 60% weighted criterion coverage. Coverage describes what was assessed, not the person’s ability.
Review stays human
Use the evidence, follow-up questions and your own notes to form a judgment. HAN does not make the hiring decision.
YOUR NEXT STEP
See it inside HAN.
Explore the public workspace with fictional examples, in your own time.